BLOG

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to advance, their use in professional settings has become increasingly common. Tools that automatically record meetings or generate notes can seem like a godsend for productivity and may often be automatically added to a meeting. However, despite these conveniences, there are the following challenges with using this technology: 

1. Privacy Concerns

Meetings often involve sensitive information, including proprietary business data, personal information, and confidential strategies. Using AI to record or transcribe meetings raises significant privacy issues: 

• Data Security: AI applications often operate on cloud platforms where data is transmitted and stored outside the company’s control, risking leaks or unauthorized access. 

• Consent: All participants must agree to be recorded. AI tools can sometimes record conversations without clear notification, violating consent protocols and legal requirements. 

2. Legal and Compliance Issues

Different jurisdictions have strict recording laws, especially when it comes to recording conversations: 

• Consent Laws: Some states or countries require all participants to consent to a recording. Failure to comply could lead to legal consequences. While Virginia is a one-party consent state, which means that any one party in a meeting can legally record the meeting without notifying any other parties in that meeting, there are ethical considerations and there may be meetings where Virginia law may not be the governing authority. 

• Industry Regulations: Sectors like healthcare and finance are governed by regulations (HIPAA, CCPA, GDPR, etc.) that restrict how sensitive data, including meeting content, can be stored and shared. 

3. Accuracy and Misinterpretation Risks

AI transcription and note-taking tools are not foolproof: 

• Errors in Transcription: AI can misinterpret words or jargon, leading to inaccurate records that could mislead decision-making. 

• Loss of Context: Nuances such as tone, sarcasm, or emphasis are often missed by AI, reducing the richness and accuracy of notes. 

• Accountability: Relying on automated notes might result in important points being overlooked due to errors, which is problematic for follow-ups and accountability. 

4. Intellectual Property Protection

Meetings and Webinars—especially brainstorming sessions or educational offerings—may involve ideas that an organization or content creator considers its intellectual property (IP). AI tools, particularly those that process data externally, could pose a risk of IP leakage or unauthorized use: 

• Once data enters third-party systems, there’s limited control over how it is stored or used. 

• This risk can deter open communication, negatively impacting innovation and collaboration. 

5. Cultural and Ethical Considerations

Introducing AI recording tools can affect the meeting culture and participant behavior: 

• Surveillance Feeling: Knowing that an AI is recording every word may make participants self-conscious or less willing to speak candidly. 

• Trust Issues: Teams may feel mistrusted if AI recordings are mandated, harming morale and open communication. 

Summary 

While AI note-taking and recording technologies offer substantial promise for efficiency and organization, the risks and implications surrounding privacy, legality, accuracy, intellectual property, and workplace culture currently outweigh the benefits in many settings. 

The PMI SWVA Board of Directors has implemented a policy of manual note-taking. Meetings or events may be recorded only with explicit consent from the participants. These stringent data security practices remain the safest ways to document meeting content and outcomes.